Free speech, political speech and “speaking truth to stupid”

Title card from The Newsroom

Where speech and truth collide

Citizens United strikes again. Yesterday, the Supreme Court narrowly defeated a Montana law that would limit political spending by corporations, thus reinforcing the belief—most recently articulated by GOP presidential nominee, Mitt Romney—that “corporations are people, too.” In this strange, new universe, political speech goes to the highest bidder, which, in most cases, puts the needs and concerns of actual people last.

In an ideal world, one scripted by Aaron Sorkin, this wouldn’t happen. Or if it did, it would be discussed, examined, debated, railed against and sermonized about with eloquent fury. Perhaps it will be written into an upcoming episode of “The Newsroom,” his new morality play now showing on HBO. I’d love to see what Sorkin makes of that!

Many of the journalists-who-cover-television (talk about meta!) panned the show, calling out its pretentiousness and noting it was full of echt-Sorkin elements (long tracking shots, fast-talking larger-than-life characters and philosophical rants). Maybe so. But compared to the uneducated, small-minded, short-term-thinking networks and frivolity on most news shows, this “Newsroom” was a bracing intellectual jolt. It took a story we knew (the BP oil spill) and gave us a gripping “making of” that presented the facts and players (the reporters and reported upon) in a new light—making it seem even more awful, if that were possible. The actors inhabited their roles and technological scene partners with grace and authenticity, revealing bits of their characters in an unshowy way. Styling did not trump storytelling (unlike, say, Madmen) and, yes, there was diversity in casting, but not something to stumble over.

And the writing… Sorkin has described dialogue as music and his use of language is rhapsodic. The words tumble over themselves and you’re left marveling at as much as what he says as how he says it. It is created to—in the words of “Newsroom’s” executive producer—to speak truth to stupid.

This Thursday, SCOTUS takes center stage again when it reveals whether or not it will uphold the constitutionality of the Patient Protection Affordable Care Act (“Obamacare,” as it is derisively called). The prognosis for the bill is grim and no doubt its opponents are already chilling the champagne. You have to wonder what the outcome would have been if the denizens of “West Wing” had framed the debate  and “The Newsroom” had brought us the story. Just saying…

8 Responses to Free speech, political speech and “speaking truth to stupid”

Jamila Hypes says: November 22, 2015 at 5:28 pm

What you wrote was very reasonable. However, what about this? what if you were to write a killer post title? I mean, I don’t wish to tell you how to run your blog, but suppose you added something that makes people desire more? I mean Free speech, political speech and “speaking truth to stupid” is a little boring. You should glance at Yahoo’s home page and note how they create post headlines to get people to open the links. You might try adding a video or a related pic or two to grab readers interested about what you’ve got to say. In my opinion, it could make your posts a little bit more interesting.

Thorsten Douglass says: May 27, 2016 at 10:05 pm

Hello there! I could have sworn I’ve been to this website before but after reading through some of the post I realized it’s new to me. Nonetheless, I’m definitely happy I found it and I’ll be bookmarking and checking back frequently!

Rob Rahman says: May 29, 2016 at 4:24 pm

Hi everyone, it’s my first go to see at this web site, and paragraph is actually fruitful designed for me, keep up posting these articles or reviews.


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *